甲状腺癌根治术中不同途径显露喉返神经的应用效果评价

目的 探讨甲状腺癌根治术中不同途径显露喉返神经的应用情况.方法 根据随机数字表法将92例进行甲状腺癌根治术的患者随机分为对照组和观察组,每组46例.对照组采用甲状腺下动脉途径法显露喉返神经,观察组采用甲状腺最下动脉途径法显露喉返神经.比较两组患者寻找喉返神经的时间、术中出血量、手术时间、术后声音嘶哑和喉返神经损伤的发生率.结果 观察组患者寻找喉返神经的时间和手术时间均明显短于对照组患者,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.01).观察组患者的术中出血量明显少于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01).观察组患者术后声音嘶哑和喉返神经损伤的发生率均低于对照组患者,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).结论 甲状腺癌根治术中应用不同途径显露喉返神经,其效果存在差异.与甲状腺下动脉途径法相比,甲状腺最下动脉途径法能够明显缩短寻找喉返神经的时间和手术时间,减少术中出血量,降低术后声音嘶哑和喉返神经损伤的发生率,值得临床推广应用.     

High expression of HVEM is associated with improved prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) displays dual signals in T-cell activation according to the ligands and intracytoplasmic effectors it interacts with. High HVEM expression may play an immunosuppressive role in several malignancies. The present study investigated the clinical impact of HVEM on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), including its prognostic value, and association with clinicopathological features and immune status. The clinical data of 102 consecutive patients with ICC who underwent surgical treatment from January 2012 to December 2017 were collected. The expression of HVEM and different types of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were investigated in ICC tissue samples by immunohistochemical staining. HVEM expression was detected in the tumor tissues of 92 (90.2%) patients with ICC. Patients with high HVEM expression were more likely to have increased peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) concentrations (P=0.031), decreased CEA (P=0.036), low TNM stage (P=0.043) and high frequencies of small-duct histological type (P=0.021) and BAP1 retained expression (P=0.010). Survival analysis showed that high HVEM expression was a favorable independent predictor of overall postoperative survival (P=0.034, hazard ratio=0.486, 95% confidence interval=0.249–0.945). In addition, no significant association of HVEM expression with CD4⁺ (P=0.512), CD8⁺ (P=0.750) or CD45RO⁺ (P=0.078) TILs was identified in the ICC tissues. These results indicate that HVEM may serve as a favorable prognostic marker for ICC. Furthermore, co-stimulatory signals from HVEM may play a dominant role in the progression of ICCs, which can be explained by an increase in the number of PBLs rather than a change in the number of TILs. However, the function of the HVEM network in ICC progression is complex and requires further study.     

Relation Between Tumor Size and Lymph Node Metastasis According to Subtypes of Breast Cancer

PurposeTumor size and lymph node metastasis are important factors that contribute to the progression of breast cancer. We aimed to analyze the relationship between tumor size and lymph node metastasis molecular subtype and examine the effects of nodal metastasis on overall survival (OS).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 16,552 patients who underwent breast surgery in Samsung Medical Center between 2000 and 2015. Information on tumor size (largest diameter of the invasive component), number of positive lymph nodes, and molecular subtype were obtained. We constructed a linear regression model to evaluate the relationship between tumor size and lymph node metastasis. To determine the effect of nodal metastasis on OS, we performed a Cox proportional regression analysis with Np/T (number of metastatic lymph nodes [n]/tumor size [cm]).ResultsThis study included 12,007 patients with a median follow-up of 62 months. The linear regression coefficients were 1.043 for luminal A, 1.024 for luminal B, 0.656 for HER2, and 0.435 for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes. No significant difference was observed in the coefficients between the luminal A and B subtypes (p = 0.797), while all other coefficients showed significant difference. After adjusting for other risk factors, the hazard ratio (HR) of Np/T for each subtype was significant for OS: luminal A (HR, 1.134; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.097–1.171; p < 0.001), luminal B (HR, 1.049; 95% CI, 1.013–1.086; p = 0.007), HER2 (HR, 1.069; 95% CI, 1.014–1.126; p = 0.013), and TNBC (HR, 1.038; 95% CI, 1.01–1.067; p = 0.008).ConclusionThe incidence of lymph node metastasis differed according to molecular subtype. Luminal types have higher incidence of nodal metastasis than HER2 and TNBC. The HR of Np/T was highest in luminal A subtypes and lowest in TNBC subtypes.     

经桡动脉途径行外周血管介入的临床研究

目的评价经桡动脉途径(TRA)行外周血管介入的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性收集2017年9月至2019年3月于中国医学科学院肿瘤医院TRA行外周血管介入治疗的106例肿瘤患者的临床资料,分析患者的桡动脉穿刺率、穿刺完成后续操作的手术成功率以及术后30 d内相关并发症。结果106例患者中,TRA外周血管介入操作112例次,其中行经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术83例次,支气管动脉灌注术4例次,盆腔肿瘤栓塞术11例次,其他手术14例次。所有介入操作穿刺成功率为97.3%(109/112),手术成功率为98.2%(107/109)。5例患者TRA失败,转为股动脉穿刺,并顺利完成操作。手术严重并发症为主动脉夹层2例次;轻微并发症中,桡动脉闭塞2例次,桡动脉痉挛1例次,手臂疼痛1例次,穿刺点血肿1例次。严重并发症和轻微并发症发生率分别为1.8%(2/112)和4.5%(5/112)。急诊操作16例次,均顺利完成操作,无并发症发生。结论TRA行外周血管介入治疗是安全、可行的。     

新冠肺炎临床评价核心指标集比较分析＊

目的 对已公开发表的新冠肺炎核心指标集及其研究方法进行比较分析，为临床试验和证据转化研究提供参考信息。方法 计算机检索COMET数据库，并补充检索CNKI、WanFang、PubMed、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library等数据库，收集发表的新型冠状病毒肺炎（Coronavirus Disease 2019，COVID-19）核心指标集（Core Outcome Set，COS）研究，检索时间截至为2021年3月31日。按照纳入排除标准筛选文献，并提取研究基本信息、研究方法及指标数据，对其进行描述性分析。结果 共纳入5项COVID-19核心指标集相关研究（4项为COVID-19-COS研究，1项为COVID-19核心指标测量工具研究）。相同的结局指标包括死亡率、病毒核酸检测、临床进展、恢复期、临床症状评分及临床分型等。指标来源主要来自临床试验注册平台和问卷调查；达成共识的方法主要采用共识会议；利益相关群体中临床专家、方法学专家和医疗管理人员涉及较多。结论 不同的新冠肺炎核心指标集研究有一定的共性，但由于应用场景不同，也存在一定差异。随着对疾病认识的深化，相关COVID-19核心指标需要加强测量方法和疗程推荐。     

Comparative Outcome Analysis of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Embolization of the False Lumen Versus Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Aortic Dissection

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization for the treatment of aortic dissection.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from February 2003 to June 2019, NBCA embolization of an aortic false lumen was attempted in 12 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 41–68 y) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed in 53 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 37–70 y) for aortic dissection with one or more indications of persisting pain, malperfusion, rupture or impending rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 55 mm, and/or rapid aortic enlargement. The main exclusion criterion for embolization was the presence of fast blood flow in the aortic false lumen on aortography. The efficacy of NBCA embolization and TEVAR was compared by evaluating technical and clinical outcomes, repeat intervention–free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients treated with NBCA embolization (91.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 9 of these 11 (81.8%). No significant difference was found between embolization and TEVAR in clinical success rates (embolization, 81.8%; TEVAR, 84.9%; P = .409) or procedure-related complications (embolization, 1 patient [8.3%]; TEVAR, 4 patients [7.5%]; P = .701). In addition, embolization showed comparable 5-y RFS (embolization, 82.5% ± 9.3; TEVAR, 85.5% ± 4.8; P = .641) and 5-y OS (embolization, 100%; TEVAR, 95.4% ± 3.2; P = .744) rates to TEVAR.ConclusionsNBCA embolization of the false lumen in aortic dissection seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality for the closure of false lumen in selected patients.     

染料木黄酮对前列腺癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭的影响及机制

本研究拟探讨染料木黄酮对前列腺癌细胞LNCaP和CWR22RV1的增殖、迁移和侵袭能力的影响。一、材料与方法1.材料:前列腺癌细胞株LNCaP和CWR22RV1(中国科学院上海生命科学研究院);Genistein(天津科瑞泰科技有限公司);RPMI 1640、胎牛血清(FBS)、胰蛋白酶(美国Gibco公司);E-钙黏蛋白(E-cadherin)、N-钙黏蛋白(N-cadherin)、波形蛋白(Vimentin,Abcam公司);聚氰基丙烯酸正丁酯(BCA)试剂盒、十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)上样缓冲液(×5)及蛋白质印迹法(Western blot)试剂盒(上海市碧云天生物公司);2.实验方法:采用噻唑蓝(MTT)实验、划痕实验和Transwell实验检测Genistein对细胞增殖、迁移及侵袭能力的影响。采用Western blot检测E-cadherin、N-cadherin、Vimentin、CD44和Oct-4的表达水平。